Abbott, Phillip. “Eisenhower, King Utopus, and the Fifties Decade in America.” Presidential Studies Quarterly. Mar 2002. 7-30. eLibrary History Study Center. Springfield Twp. HS Lib. 25 March 2006. http://www.historystudycenter.com>.
This article, written by a professor of political science at Wayne State University, compared Eisenhower to King Utopus, the head of Utopia in Sir Thomas More’s Utopia. Abbott argues that during the fifties, when America was struggling to reinvent itself after the Great Depression and World War II, a lot of political, social, and economic planning was akin to Utopian thought. It is an interesting perspective, and reminds the reader that Utopian ideas are everywhere.
Bisk, Tsvi. “Toward a Practical Utopianism: Utopian Thinking needs to be Rescued from Fantasy and Fanaticism; It Must Embrace Science but Disclaim Moral Relativism.” The Futurist. May 2002. 22 – 26. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
Tsvi Bisk, the author of this article, is the director of the Center for Strategic Futurist Thinking, as well as a former senior associate of the Beit Berl Institute. His article discusses a Utopian theory Bisk calls Neo-Utopianism. In the article, Bisk suggests that the Utopian vision needs to become more practical, if it will ever become a reality. He argues that we need to incorporate modern thought and values into a Utopian society. His article offers an interesting theory on how to proceed in creating a Utopian society in today’s world.
Cosgel, Metin M., Thomas J. Miceli, and John E. Murray. “Organization and Distributional Equality in a Network of Communes: The Shakers.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Apr. 1997. 1-16. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
This article, written by three economics professors (Professors Cosgel and Miceli from the University of Connecticut and Professor Murray from the University of Toldeo), discusses the Shakers, a religious Utopian society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The authors point out that even though the Shaker communities were supposed to be egalitarian, Utopian societies, they were still not equal. The article discusses the Shaker practice of putting members into communal work groups called “families.” It goes on to indicate that different families had different economic status, leading to a society differentiated by economic classes. The article does a good job of pointing out the problems with a communal society, and how Utopian communities are hardly ever perfectly, ideally, Utopian.
De Vorsey, Louis. “A Land of New Beginnings: James Edward Oglethorpe’s Map of an American Utopia.” Mercator’s World. May-June 2002. 18-24. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
This article discusses James Oglethorpe’s Utopian vision when planning out the state of Georgia. The author, Dr. Louis De Vorsey, is a retired history professor from the University of Georgia. He has written fifteen books, and among many other honors, is a Fellow of the Society for the History of Discoveries. The article details Oglethorpe’s efforts to make Georgia a Utopia, including his town planning and settlement policies. It also provides several of Oglethorpe’s original maps, planning out his ideal Georgia. This article is a well-written and informative reminder that Utopian vision helped found this country.
Huffman, Donald W. “Life in a Hutterite Colony: An Outsider’s Experience and Reflections on a Forgotten People in Our Midst.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Oct. 2000. 549. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
This article by Donald W. Huffman, a professor and board member at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University studies the Hutterites, a Protestant religious sect which has several thriving colonies throughout North America. Huffman attempts to discover the secret to the success of these Utopian communities. The author lived with a Hutterite colony, learning about their way of life. In this article, he concludes that a combination of the Hutterites’ religious beliefs, family structure, equal division of labor, and well-developed community planning strategy. This article is an excellent example of a modern, prospering Utopian society, and offers insight on how a Utopian society can be achieved.
Roach, Monique Patenaude. “The Loss of Religious Allegiance among the Youth of the Oneida Community.” The Historian. Summer 2001. 787. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
Professor Roach, the author of this article, teaches in the Department of History at LeMoyne College. The article discusses the Oneida community, a religious Utopian society advocating communal living and free love. In the article, Roach attempts to explain the breakup of Oneida, and attributes most of the disintegration to Oneida’s youth. She argues that the adult offspring of the first generation of Oneida citizens rejected Oneida’s religious teachings in favor of more modern, scientific views. As an example, Roach points to founder John Humphrey Noyes’s own son, who rejected his father’s views. This article details a good example of one of the ways a good idea can fall apart.
Thies, Clifford F. “The Success of American Communes.” Southern Economic Journal. July 2000. 186. General Reference Center Gold. Gale Group. Springfield Township HS Lib. 25 Mar. 2006. http://galenet.galegroup.com>.
The author of this article, Dr. Clifford Thies, is a professor of Economics and Finance at Shenandoah University’s Buisness School. In this article, he studies 281 American communes from 1683 to 1937, analyzing their structures and their levels of success. He finds some common factors which seem to indicate a community will be successful, including being pious, inducing commitment in members, allowing some private property, and having a partially anarchic government. In the end, Dr. Thies concludes that a community can increase its likelihood of success if it gives it at least partially to the egoism of its members. This article is extremely interesting, and provides a great overview of the hundreds of Utopian societies that have existed in America.